Answer to Question #8813 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Instrumentation and Measurements — Instrument Calibration (IC)

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:


I am in the process of ordering a 131I mock rod source to use with our phantom. In the past we have used a 3.7 × 103 Bq 133Ba source, but I have been told we need a combo 133Ba and 137Cs. If so, where do I purchase one?


These mixed 133Ba-137Cs sources seem to be less available than they had been in the past. They have the advantage that the 133Ba provides photons in the 360 keV energy region to simulate the dominant photons from 131I, and the 137Cs produces 662 keV photons, which are close to the less dominant 640 keV photons from 131I. If you use such a source you must be aware that the relative photon composition will change over time because the 133Ba half-life is about 10 years compared to the 30-year half-life of 137Cs. I cannot provide a name of a supplier in which I am confident, but I would try a company such as Isotope Products (now under Eckert & Ziegler). Contact the company and discuss your needs.

I should point out that you can effectively use a 133Ba source under some conditions. In particular, if you use this single source you should do a one-time comparison measurement with a calibrated 131I sample so that you can properly set up your spectrometer and assess the relative counting efficiencies in the determined window region. Generally the window region that you define for counting of the dominant photons (about 360 keV) for 131I will be about the same as the window region for counting 133Ba (dominant gamma energy also about 360 keV). The 131I counting efficiency will often be somewhat greater than the 133Ba counting efficiency because of the higher yield of photons in the region of interest, but this can vary depending on how you set the counting window.

Good luck.

George Chabot, PhD, CHP

Answer posted on 24 February 2010. The information posted on this web page is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may affect the applicability of concepts, materials, and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice. To the best of our knowledge, answers are correct at the time they are posted. Be advised that over time, requirements could change, new data could be made available, and Internet links could change, affecting the correctness of the answers. Answers are the professional opinions of the expert responding to each question; they do not necessarily represent the position of the Health Physics Society.