Answer to Question #10779 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"
The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:
I am a dental hygienist asking if taking a bitewing dental x ray using digital phosphor plates (63 kVp, 08 mA with exposure time of 0.125 seconds) is a lot of radiation exposure to a patient? Usually four bitewings (BWs) and two periapical (PA) radiographs are taken once a year. Is it enough to cause cancer? What about 63 kVp, 08 mA with exposure time of 0.32 seconds? Patients are asking what amounts they are exposed to. We explain to our patients about exposures but I would like to go more in-depth with them.
Thank you so much for your time. This will ease a lot of patients’ minds.
The short answer is that no, the amount of radiation in digital bitewing and periapical radiographs is not a lot of radiation; and, at these low doses, it is extremely unlikely that cancer will occur as a result of the exposures. There are several ways to evaluate exposure to radiation in these small doses.
First of all, it is generally accepted that radiation physicists as a group, do not fully understand the body’s reactions to what is termed “low-dose radiation” which all routine intraoral and panoramic radiography falls into. Just how much radiation is the patient in your practice being exposed to? About 1 mSv per exposure, or about 6 mSv for four BWs and two PAs, depending on which PAs you take. We are all exposed to background ionizing radiation 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The average person in the United States receives about 8 mSv of radiation every day, so this dose is less than one day’s radiation dose. A typical panoramic radiograph is ~16 mSv, or roughly two days of background radiation equivalence. A digital FMX (full-mouth x ray) (including photostimulable phosphor plates) using rectangular collimation will yield about 38 mSv of radiation dose; an FMX with digital receptors and standard round cones yields about 160 mSv; and, finally, an FMX using D-speed film and round collimation yields about 388 mSv. These numbers are from White & Pharoah’s 6th Edition of Oral Radiology: Principles & Interpretation, which is the leading textbook used in dental schools today.
Secondly, the best way to limit radiation exposure is simply not to order and expose radiographs unless there is a reasonable chance that the information obtained from the radiographs will affect treatment outcomes. That is why today, the recommendation is for absolutely zero “routine” radiographs and that radiographs only be taken after a clinical examination and when there is an expectation that the radiographs will yield diagnostically helpful information.
I hope this information is helpful!!
Jeffery B. Price, DDS, MS
Associate Professor of Oral Radiology