|
||||
Pregnancy and Security Screening
I am pregnant and
operate an x-ray machine at a courthousethe type that scans items
people carry in with them. Should I have any concerns? Should I
continue working?
Baggage
x-ray machines emit x rays just like medical x-ray machines except at
much, much lower levels. The location of the operator is very well
shielded and, really, exposes no one. It is safe to continue working
while you're pregnant.
As a pregnant woman, does passing through airport security pose a risk to my baby?
Passing
through an airport security portal does not pose a risk to a pregnant
woman or her unborn child. The metal detector is not known to pose any
health risk to individuals. The devices used to scan your carry-ons are
very well shielded so there is no risk from passing by those, either.
I reached into an airport x-ray screener that is used to see in to our carry-on items. How much radiation exposure did I get?
There
is nothing for you to worry about. Airport x-ray machines and similar
x-ray machines used by federal and state agencies to screen briefcases
and packages give much lower doses than x-ray machines in hospitals and
medical clinics-almost immeasurable. They are designed this way because
they do not have to see as much detail, are not designed for looking
into very large objects, and are usually looking for things that really
"stand out" on images (like metal).
In all likelihood, your hand was not in the actual beam, which would have made your exposure much lower. Furthermore, the hands and feet are very radiation tolerant relative to the rest of the body.
Does radiation from a security screening device, like those used in airports, affect the items that pass through them such as baby bottles, food items, plants, electronic devices (cell phone), or drug products (like injectable nitroglycerin for a heart condition)?
The
radiation exposure from these devices is too low to affect any items
passing through (other than certain types of camera film which can
darken), even from repeated exposures. Additionally, in case you were
wondering, there isn't any residual radiation in exposed materials
after the exposure is complete either.
Does radiation from a security screening device, like those used in airports, affect clothing if it passes through the screening a lot? I have a Gore-Tex® jacket that gets screened quite a bit.
The amount of radiation to which the clothing, even the Gore-Tex®
jacket, is exposed is too small to degrade the materials. The
manufacturers of these scanners indicate the radiation exposure to an
item from one scan is about one-tenth the exposure we receive every day
from naturally occurring radiation (commonly called background
radiation).
I
travel a lot (at least once or twice a week) and will continue to do so
in the foreseeable future. Obviously, I have to go through the metal detector at least twice for each trip. What effect does this radiation exposure have on me in the long run?
The
metal detector does not expose you to ionizing radiation, e.g., x rays;
neither do the wands that are used for individual screening. Metal
detectors operate by generating a low-intensity magnetic field that
passes from one side of the detector to the other. If metal objects
pass through that field, the magnetic field will induce a second field
in the metal object. Since that second field is a disruption of the
first field, the detector senses the change and sets off an alarm.
Magnetic fields are a form of radiation, but they are called
"nonionizing" radiation. This means that magnetic fields do not
generate additional, damaging radiation the way that ionizing radiation
(such as x rays) does. Magnetic fields below a certain intensity are
considered to be safe in that they will not cause any biological damage
to an individual. As a reference, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is
considered safe and uses much higher magnetic field intensity than a
metal detector. In summary, because of its nonionizing properties, the
magnetic field generated in a metal detector will not cause harm to
persons even with routine and/or repeated scanning.
The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||
| This page last updated 08 September 2010. Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Security Notice | Webmaster | ||||