What method is best for measuring 226Ra and 228Ra in the body?
Is there a whole-body method, not a urine count?

Neither radionuclide is easily measured directly by
whole-body counting (WBC), because neither is a strong gamma-ray emitter. However,
both have strong gamma emitters among their progeny that are easily measured by
whole-body counting. For 226Ra, the gamma-emitting progeny are 214Pb
and 214Bi, the latter of which emits gammas at energies of 0.609,
1.12, and 1.76 MeV. The 1.76-MeV gamma ray, because it is higher in energy than
the 1.46-MeV gamma ray from naturally occurring 40K, is usually used
for WBC. The WBC gives the body content of 214Pb/214Bi,
and to derive the body content of 226Ra, some measurement or
assumption must be made to determine the retention of 222Rn (the
first decay product of 226Ra, and the parent of 214Bi/214Pb)
by the body. This can be done by a measurement of 222Rn exhaled in
the breath, but this technique is not readily available. In the long-term
follow-up of radium workers, the average long-term 222Rn retention
was 37 percent (Toohey et al. 1983), but this factor could be different for
recent exposures. 

Similarly, the first decay product
of 228Ra, 228Ac emits gamma rays of energies around 0.9
MeV and can be measured directly; since the half-life of 228Ac is
only 6.15 hours, it can be assumed to be in equilibrium with 228Ra.
Another member of the decay chain, 208Tl emits a strong gamma ray at
2.62 MeV, and its relative equilibrium with 228Ra can be determined
by comparing the measured activities of 208Tl and 228Ac
in vivo. Research-quality whole-body counters, such as the one at Argonne
National Laboratory-East, which was specifically designed for the detection of 226Ra
and 228Ra in former radium workers, have detection limits of a few
nCi (or about 100 Bq) of 214Bi or 228Ac. A commercial
whole-body counter would have detection limits several times higher, because of
higher background levels.

It should be noted that typical
environmental intakes of 226Ra and 228Ra, such as from
well waters that exceed the Environmental Protection Agency standard for
drinking water (5 pCi [185 Bq] per liter for each radionuclide) would be
unlikely to exceed the detection limits of WBC, and indoor levels that high of 222Rn
(10s of pCi or 100s of Bq per liter of air) will severely interfere with the
measurement of 226Ra via 214Bi.

Richard E. Toohey, CHP, PhD

Reference
Toohey RE, Keane AT, Rundo J. Measurement techniques for radium
and the actinides in man at the center for human radiobiology. Health Phys 44 (Suppl. 1):323-341; 1983.

 

Answer posted on 20 February 2008. The information posted on this web page is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may affect the applicability of concepts, materials, and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice. To the best of our knowledge, answers are correct at the time they are posted. Be advised that over time, requirements could change, new data could be made available, and Internet links could change, affecting the correctness of the answers. Answers are the professional opinions of the expert responding to each question; they do not necessarily represent the position of the Health Physics Society.