HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. August Newsletter
. August ORS
. August Journal
Upcoming Events
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 8th South American IRPA Regional Congress
10-15 October 2010
Medelin, Columbia
30 July 2010

Answer to Question #709 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Doses and Dose Calculations — Internal dose calculations

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
In determining bioassay results, what approach(es) do you use in establishing background values for 14C bioassays?
A
You know how they say your employees are your best assets. In this case it is absolutely true. What you need to determine a background for 14C in urine is a background population that will provide you with representative data. In this case this population is a group of your employees who do not handle radioactive materials, your administrative staff and business managers, or sales people. You should obtain approximately 20-30 urine samples (24-hour urines if available) and perform the identical analysis that you plan to perform on your occupationally exposed employees. Now you have a set of data which should be fairly representative of your employees. This is your background data. An alternative to this method would be to buy or make synthetic urine (yes they make artificial everything these days). The National Institute of Standards and Technology provides freeze-dried urine samples with toxic substances and other drug metabolites and may be able to provide standard freeze-dried urine—phone: 301-975-6776, fax: 301-948-3730, or email: srminfo@nist.gov for the latest prices. A recipe for synthetic urine is available (done by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [PNNL]) Report 6490 (1988) from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. You should now perform the standard statistical analysis on this data to determine the average background, standard deviation of background, etc. Plug this into your favorite minimum detectable activity (MDA) or lower limit of detection (LLD) formulas and Voila. You have the LLD for your entire process that includes your individual variations, and all. If you are interested in a very rigorous analysis (that is, you are a real glutton for punishment) you can check out the following link for PNNL's Bayesian Analysis Web page to help you determine the appropriate LLD for your samples. Two references for determining the LLD/MDA can be found in:
  • Currie LA. Limits for qualitative detection and quantification determination. Analytical Chemistry 40(3):587-593; 1968.  
  • Altshuler B, Pasternak B. Statistical measures of the lower limit of detection of a radioactivity counter. Health Physics 34(9):293-298; 1963.

Shawn Googins, CHP

Answer posted on 28 February 2001. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings