HPS masthead
search
What's New?
September Journal
September Newsletter
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009
San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
07 September 2008

Answer to Question #6448 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Nuclear Power — Nuclear Accidents

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Every summer some children from the areas of Belarus, and I think also Ukraine, which were worst affected by the Chernobyl reactor accident, visit our district in the United Kingdom for a holiday. The charity which organises this says that they come over in the summer because their home area is more contaminated then due to the dry dusty conditions. This has made me wonder—do they bring some of this radioactive stuff with them on clothing, luggage, etc? Is it okay for my young children to use the same amenities (for example, public transport, local swimming pool, adventure playground/outdoor activity centre, cinema, cafés, and shops)? It's great that these kids get a holiday, and it would be even better if I knew enough to know that I was worrying needlessly.

A

Your question is quite sensible, in that the Chernobyl accident caused very wide-spread contamination, particularly in Belarus. The short answer to your question is that the children coming from Belarus (or Ukraine or Russia for that matter) do not carry on their clothes or bodies contamination that could then affect you or your family.

And now for the long answer. It is true that the land where the children live is still contaminated. That is, if I were to take a soil sample I would, with sensitive instruments, be able to detect radioactive caesium and a few other radionuclides.

However, today, over 21 years after the Chernobyl accident, much has changed in the contaminated areas. Of course there have been massive works to remove contamination from public areas (for example, streets, houses, schools, etc.), and these have been aided by natural processes (wind and rain) to "wash away" the contamination. By wash away, I mean that some has seeped into the ground and groundwater, and some has been carried away by surface water. These dilution processes do redistribute the contamination, yet the amount of contamination in the ground and water in these regions today is well below allowable limits and is not a health issue (I would let my 11-year-old and my six-year-old drink that water for example). All this to say that while the children in Belarus do live in a "contaminated environment," they are not "wallowing" in contamination.

So, you then ask, what is the problem in Belarus? Well, in fact, there are two problems. First, in Belarus much of the food that is eaten by people living in the contaminated areas is grown in the contaminated areas. These are poor, rural areas where not much is imported. As I just explained, the contamination levels (including on farms and fields) are low and decreasing, but fruits and vegetables will still take contaminants from the soil and concentrate them, and then if these are eaten the contaminants will cause exposure in people.

There are lots of processes in place to assure that the food that is eaten is not contaminated, but some of it still is, so people still get some dose from the food they eat (particular foods, like mushrooms from the forest—a delicacy among villagers in Belarus—are more contaminated than others).

The second problem is that even with very small amounts of contamination still left on surfaces (for example, roads, walls, roofs, etc.) the people living there will be exposed to radiation from these sources. And what does this mean to these people? Well, one report I read characterised these folks as "ordinary people living in extraordinary circumstances." I think that this says it all. However in terms of their radiation dose, these days they are virtually all below what you and I are allowed to get, that is, 1 millisievert per year. Yes, there are a few above this level, but there are efforts to bring these people's dose to below 1 millisievert per year.

Okay, so back to your question about children coming to the United Kingdom for vacations. Given that the contamination levels in Belarus are very low today, and given that the people living in the contaminated areas are not "wallowing in dirt," the children who get off the plane in the United Kingdom will not have contamination on their clothes or on their bodies and will not cause any health risk at all to anyone with or near them.

Edward N. Lazo, CHP, PhD
 

Answer posted on 15 May 2007. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings