HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. August Newsletter
. August ORS
. August Journal
Upcoming Events
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 8th South American IRPA Regional Congress
10-15 October 2010
Medelin, Columbia
30 July 2010

Answer to Question #6134 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Homeland Security

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Recently, in the news, there was a report of a sting operation in the Republic of Georgia. In that news report, the anchor stated that a man was arrested for trying to sell weapons-grade, highly enriched uranium. He had a sample with 3.5 ounces of weapons-grade, highly enriched uranium in his pocket in a plastic bag. I was under the impression that you can't just carry around highly enriched uranium. I thought it was so toxic that to carry it around unshielded meant you were going to die. Am I wrong? Is 3.5 ounces such a small quantity that the smuggler won't die? What, if any, health risk is there to carrying 3.5 ounces of unshielded weapons-grade highly enriched uranium? I have been trying to find a chart and some explanation of the effects of exposure to X amount of weapons-grade, highly enriched uranium on unprotected human beings.  

A

Highly enriched uranium contains the isotope 235U to the extent of at least 20 percent, the remainder being primarily 238U. The 235U decays by alpha decay and also emits a number of conversion electrons and some x rays and gamma rays. The most dominant gamma ray has an energy of 185 keV and occurs in about 54 out of every 100 disintegrations. The major reason that significant masses of 235U may be handled with relatively little external dose hazard is because the half-life is quite long, namely 704 million years.

The radioactive decay rate of the uranium is inversely proportional to the half-life; thus, for the 3.5 ounces that you mention, if it were 100 percent 235U, the total 235U activity would be about 0.21 millicuries, which represents a decay rate of about 8 million disintegrations per second. While this number seems high, it is not a very large amount of activity from a hazards standpoint. Thus, even at a distance of 1 cm from the uranium, if there were no attenuation of the gamma radiation within the uranium itself and the uranium were concentrated in the form of a very small sphere (in reality, a sphere containing this quantity of uranium would have a diameter of about 2 cm), the soft tissue dose rate would be less than 7 mSv/hr. In actuality because of considerable self-shielding of the gamma rays by the uranium material, and because of source geometry effects, the actual gamma dose rate would be appreciably less than this.

While the activity is high enough to be detected at reasonably close distances by most detectors being used for homeland-security purposes, it is not high enough to present an acute radiation hazard to a smuggler who might carry the material in his pocket. Most of the alpha radiations and electrons emitted from the uranium are absorbed within the source material and those that escape from decay events near the uranium surface are attenuated heavily by any material around the uranium and by clothing. The 238U present has a half-life about six times greater than that of the 235U and emits very few weak gamma rays, and it would not be an exposure problem.

The low exposure threat of highly enriched uranium is further demonstrated by the fact that such material has been in use as fuel in many research and test reactors throughout the world. When new fuel assemblies are fabricated and sent to such reactors for use, the external radiations present no appreciable threat to workers, who commonly handle new fuel elements directly with no special external radiation protection, generally simply wearing gloves to prevent possible skin contamination and to prevent transferring foreign material to the fuel elements. A shipment of such fuel may contain well over a kilogram of 235U.

Compared to some other radioactive materials, uranium is not extremely radiotoxic if taken into the human body. If the uranium is present in either a metallic form or in a refractory oxide form (common for uranium), its threat as an internal hazard is rather easy to control. Even keeping the material in a closed plastic bag can prevent any significant loss of the material and internal contamination can be minimized. Again, because of the long half-life, an intake large enough to represent a severe hazard would represent a macroscopic quantity large enough that it would be very unlikely that such an intake could occur.

George Chabot, PhD, CHP
 

Answer posted on 13 February 2007. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings