HPS masthead
search
What's New?
September Journal
September Newsletter
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009
San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
08 September 2008

Answer to Question #606 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Nuclear Power — Nuclear Accidents

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
Do you have data or bibliography concerning radioactivity contamination of mountain pastures by 137Cs rising by nuclear accidents (Chernobyl or others)?
A
Mountain pastures (and nonmountain pastures) were contaminated with 137Cs by global fallout from the tests of nuclear weapons in the 1950s and 1960s and by the Chernobyl accident in 1986. These were the more significant sources.

In general the amount of contamination per unit area of ground surface was strongly dependent upon the amount of rainfall. A general reference on this subject is the recently published report by the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. New York: United Nations; Sales No. E.00.IX.3; 2000). This report summarizes the data on global fallout and has a special chapter on Chernobyl exposures and effects. The report also contains extensive bibliographic citations on these subjects.

If you want more detailed information on the contamination of pastures at particular locations, a good source would be "The atlas of caesium-137 contamination of Europe after the Chernobyl accident." I don't have a copy of this large document, which contains about 100 color maps, but it was prepared under the Joint Study Project (JSP6) of the CEC/CIS Collaborative Programme on the Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident, implemented into the European Commission's Radiation Protection Research Action. As you can tell from the title, this document pertains only to Europe; contamination in the United States and Asia was much, much smaller. If you have an interest in this publication, I will try to get the name of a contact at the European Commission for you. Unfortunately, there has recently been a nearly complete turnover of personnel in that program.

Lynn Anspaugh, PhD
Answer posted on 11 January 2001. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings