HPS masthead
search
What's New?
August ORS
August Journal
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009
San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
20 July 2008

Answer to Question #5218 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Industrial Radiation — Industrial Applications

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
We are performing digital x ray using a 9 or 15 MeV Linatron. The camera is not in the direct beam path. To shield the digital camera we used 2.5-inch thick tungsten. We now find we have a very high neutron dose within the shielded container. Would we have seen this same problem using lead or is tungsten worse? What can we do to eliminate the neutron activation in the shielded container? Would it be enough to add boron plastic or powder coat the container? Even without the neutron problem we still need to shield the camera from the x rays.

A

The linatron is an industrial linear accelerator manufactured by Varian Medical Systems1. In a linatron, the electron beam strikes a target, producing bremsstrahlung which is then collimated with internal collimators and sometimes with external collimators. The target and internal collimator are typically made of some high-Z material such as tungsten. The accelerator head is usually shielded with lead or tungsten. Neutron production will take place in any material struck by an electron or bremsstrahlung beam above a threshold energy (Eth). The minimum threshold for photoneutron production in tungsten and lead is 6.19 MeV and 6.11 MeV, respectively (NCRP 1984). Thus a linatron operating at 9 MV will produce neutrons. The photoneutron spectrum from the accelerator head resembles that of a fission spectrum. The spectrum changes after penetration through the head shielding. Since the linatron is usually operated in a concrete-shielded room, room-scattered neutrons will further soften the spectrum. Neutrons are classified as:

Thermal:  En = 0.025 eV at 20°C; typically En < 0.5 eV (cadmium resonance)
Intermediate:  0.5 eV <En <10 keV
Fast:  En > 10 keV
where En is the neutron energy.

The neutrons observed at the camera location will consist primarily of neutrons leaking directly from the accelerator head, room-scattered neutrons, neutrons produced in the object to be imaged by the primary bremsstrahlung beam, and neutrons scattered from the object to be imaged. Since the camera is not in the direct-beam path, photoneutrons can only be produced in the shielding by leakage photons or photons scattered from the object to be imaged. Since leakage photons are typically only 1 percent or 0.01 percent of the primary beam or even lower, neutron production in the camera shielding from leakage photons can be considered negligible, as can neutrons produced by photons scattered from the object. Therefore changing the shielding from tungsten to lead will not significantly reduce the neutrons at the camera location. The camera can be shielded from neutrons with several inches of a hydrogeneous material such as polyethylene. If thermal neutrons are also of concern, polyethylene doped with 5 percent boron (borated polyethylene) can be used. Boron has a much higher cross-section than polyethylene for thermal neutron capture. Boron interacts with thermal neutrons by undergoing an (n,α) reaction producing 7Li, which then undergoes an isomeric transition by emitting a 0.478 MeV photon or gamma ray. These photons are much lower in energy than the thermal neutron capture gammas (2.2 MeV) from hydrogen in the polyethylene. A sandwich construction of tungsten (or lead), polyethylene, and tungsten (or lead) will work best.

Nisy E. Ipe, PhD, CHP

 

References:
National Bureau of Standards. Shielding for high-energy electron accelerator installation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Press Office. NBS Handbook No. 97; 1964.

National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Neutron contamination from medical electron accelerators. Bethesda, MD: NCRP; Report No. 79; 1984.

Footnote:
1 Varian Medical Systems, Industrial Products, Palo Alto, CA  94304-1000 

 


Answer posted on 22 March 2006. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings