|
||||||||
Answer to Question #3771 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Radiation Workers The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
I am a resident in anesthesiology and am regularly involved in day-long surgical fluoroscopic procedures 3-10 days per month that may have cumulative fluoroscopy times of 150-200 minutes per day for one to four patients. We do wear protective aprons but are often unable to distance ourselves from the tube due to cramped rooms and our equipment. Additionally, we have not been provided with any monitoring badges despite repeated requests. Does our potential exposure warrant monitoring and would a leaded portable screen be preferable to a leaded apron? A
It is unusual for surgical procedures to require more than 10 minutes of fluoroscopy time, and most require much less than 10 minutes. If your numbers are correct, that is, 150 to 200 minutes of fluoroscopy time for one to four patients, or 38 to 200 minutes per patient, then you have some potentially serious problems that need to be addressed. Fluoroscopy times of 200 minutes on a single patient have the potential for radiation doses that can exceed the skin response level for the patient. Such long fluoroscopy times could certainly lead to doses to staff in excess of the occupational limits. The best approach would be to address your concerns to the Chief of Radiology and the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO). If fluoroscopy times typically exceed 10 minutes, this might indicate a need for additional training for the operators of the x-ray units or assistance from radiologists or radiology residents for difficult-to-image patients. It might also indicate a need for testing of the fluoroscopy equipment to assure that it is operating properly and providing quality images for reasonable doses. The RSO should be able to provide or arrange for testing of the equipment, an evaluation of the potential doses to patients, and typical scatter radiation to staff who are in the room during the procedures. The RSO can also determine if personnel monitoring or some other method of monitoring is indicated for evaluation of staff exposures. What you describe is not consistent with our experiences. Our monitoring indicates:
Leaded aprons do not protect the thyroid gland or lens of the eyes from scattered radiation. Leaded thyroid collars and leaded glasses must also be worn when there is potential for high doses from scattered x rays. Leaded mobile screens are available that can shield the entire body from scattered radiation. Kenneth L. Miller, CHP, CMHP
Answer posted on 18 May 2004. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
||||||||
| Ask a Question • Search ATE & ATE Categories • If you have Web-related problems, contact our Webmaster. If you are lost, see our site map. This page last updated 02 July 2008. | ||||||||