HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. April Newsletter
. April Journal
Upcoming Events
. 2010 Summer Professional Development School
Internal Dosimetry
23 - 26 June 2010
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 2010 Meeting of the Air Monitoring Users Group
4-7 May 2010
Las Vegas, NV
21 March 2010

Answer to Question #3486 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Policy, Guidelines, and Regulations

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q

NUREG-1717 lists an exemption for steel mills using 60CO as refractory wear indicators in blast furnaces. Can you explain how this works, how much 60Co is used, and is this really common in today's mills or a thing of the past? If still used, how much 60Co would be expected to enter the metal product produced in the furnace?

A

The answer to your question has been provided by Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff personnel responsible for the NUREG and a health physicist working in the steel industry.

The exemption is referenced in NUREG-1717, "Systematic Radiological Assessment of Exemptions for Source and Byproduct Materials," on pages 2-18 and 2-19 (Section 2.2.3.3, Steel Contaminated with 60Co).

A 60Co source is embedded in the refractory material (typically bricks) for steel blast furnaces. A radiation detector located in the vicinity of the refractory indicates that the source is in place. When the refractory material wears, the source (typically 1-10 mCi) drops into the steel and the radiation detector no longer shows activity. This is how the 60Co source is used as a refractory wear detector.

The NUREG only devotes two fairly short paragraphs to this and states that dose rates from a steel slab have been calculated and references a memorandum to the NRC dated 1 March 1996 titled "Radiation Levels from Steel Contaminated with 60Co: A Limited Study of Potential Regulatory Issues."

The calculated doses were not high enough to exceed the threshold and warrant another calculation with less conservative, more realistic assumptions. Therefore, this process was listed as an exemption and below further regulatory concern. According to one individual in the industry, the practice is still in limited use in the United States and in more general use world wide. You may want to contact a health physicist in the steel industry for more precise information in this area.

Linda M. Sewell, CHP
ATE Editor, Nuclear Power/Industry

Answer posted on 26 March 2004. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings