HPS masthead
search
What's New?
. April Newsletter
. April Journal
Upcoming Events
. 2010 Summer Professional Development School
Internal Dosimetry
23 - 26 June 2010
Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho
. International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine
1-3 September 2010
Varna, Bulgaria
. 2010 Meeting of the Air Monitoring Users Group
4-7 May 2010
Las Vegas, NV
20 March 2010

Answer to Question #2983 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Medical and Dental Equipment/Shielding — Shielding

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
I work in a physician's office. In the neighboring office is a physician performing fluoroscopy-guided epidurals. I was nervous when they moved in because I know they did not install a lead wall. Further, I also know the unit was never inspected and approved by the state, the Environmental Protection Agency, or any other agency. I sit directly on the other side of the wall of the fluoroscopy unit. The wall is made of plasterboard. My distance from the unit directly through the wall is approximately 10 feet. Am I at risk? Do they need a lead wall? Can a physician perform these activities without some outside licensed/government approval?
A

Since I am not familiar with you, your office, and the office with the fluoroscopy, I have a difficult time evaluating your comments indicating that the office next door is operating without any approved shielding recommendations or surveys.

I can tell you that the accepted process in most states is for the facility, which in this case is the physician, to register with the state in order to possess and use x-ray equipment. Typically, a c-arm fluoroscopy unit, like the ones used for epidural pain procedures, is mobile and shielding is not required when that unit remains truly mobile, that is, it is used in a number of rooms. Many times with facilities like you describe, the unit stays in one room for its use. In this case a shielding evaluation by a Qualified Radiation Expert is typically required by the state, since it is essentially a "fixed" unit.

Shielding recommendations are based on a number of items such as the following: (1) workload, that is, the average time the fluoroscopy radiation beam is actually on per week, (2) the distance to the areas in question, for example, distance you are from the x-ray unit when it is operating, (3) occupancy of adjacent areas, that is, if you are at a desk full-time, the occupancy is 1, instead of some fraction, (4) whether the persons in adjacent areas are occupationally exposed or nonoccupationally exposed, for example, you would be considered a nonoccupational worker since you work in a different office, and (5) the maximum energy of the x-ray beam. Since I have no data for the actual use of this unit, for example, the number of patients per week and average amount of fluoroscopy "on" time, I cannot tell you if lead is needed in the walls of the treatment room.

Also, when a vendor installs a piece of x-ray equipment, there is a Food and Drug Administration form that must be completed indicating the installation. Copies of this form are given to the purchaser and to the state regulatory agency. If this unit was purchased through normal channels, then the state you are in should have a copy of this form. If they do not have record of that facility being registered, they should contact the facility and make them aware of the requirements.

After the unit is in place, a Qualified Radiation Expert should make a survey of all surrounding areas to determine if shielding in place is adequate. Please note that some installations may not require any shielding based on the amount of use of the unit. If the facility next to you has not been shielded, but a survey has shown that measured radiation dose rates are acceptable in adjacent areas, then your risk is low. If there has been no shielding plan and no survey and the individual operating the unit is not registered with the state, your risk may be measurably higher. However, without any evaluation, the question cannot be answered. If this has been going on for a short time, you should not be too concerned.

If you do believe in your assertions regarding inadequate protect, I recommend that you have your supervisor or physician contact the physician next door and discuss your concerns. If this does not resolve the issue, and you have good reason to believe that the adjacent office is performing x-ray procedures without state approval, shielding plan review, or surveys, you are entitled to call the state radiation control branch and voice your concerns.

Ken "Duke" Lovins, CHP

Editor’s Note: A list of state radiation regulatory agencies can be found at the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors’ Web site.

Answer posted on 7 October 2003. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings