HPS masthead
search
What's New?
PDF HPS Issues Position on Ensuring a Domestic Supply of Medical Radioisotopes
PDF HPS Comments on Radioactive CsCl Source Security and Replacement
October Newsletter
October Journal
Upcoming Events
IRPA 12
19-24 October 2008
HPS Midyear Meeting
Recent Advances in Planning and Response to Radiation Emergencies
31 January - 3 February 2009

San Antonio, Texas
54th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society
12-16 July 2009
Minneapolis, Minnesota
07 October 2008

Answer to Question #1825 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"

Category: Environmental and Background Radiation — Geological Formation, Ores

The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field:

Q
While checking my son's rock collection with my Gammascout radiation detector, one of his rocks registered a maximum of 0.59 microsievert (µSv)/hr. at a distance of about 1/2 to 1 inch from the detector. The rock is about 1/4 to 1/2 cubic inches in size. Is there any hazard in keeping this rock or holding it or the dust on the outside of it? During the test, the rock was held for about 5 to 10 minutes. There is a chance that the rock could have uranium in it because my son had an educational rock display that listed uranium as one of the rocks included in the set from which he had removed all the rocks that he put with his collection some time ago.
A
It is likely that the rock in question does contain elevated levels of uranium, but keep in mind that all the rocks in your son's collection contain some uranium. One other possibility: if not uranium, the elevated measurements might indicate thorium. For those of us who have trouble with the new units, 0.59 µSv/hr translates to 59 µrem/hr—approximately six times background. And that is at one inch. Beyond one foot, the radiation levels will be indistinguishable from background. It is true that the exposure rate to the hand will be higher when holding the material but, even then, any resulting exposure will be extremely low. Even the accidental ingestion of the small quantities of dust associated with the rock would pose no hazard. Nevertheless, it is always prudent to wash one's hands after handling material like this. The bottom line is that having this rock in the collection is substantially safer than many other activities he could, and probably does, engage in, for example, riding a bicycle or playing baseball. Paul Frame, PhD, CHP
Answer posted on 16 April 2002. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
Home Affiliates Ask the Experts Radiation Terms Employment Meetings