|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Answer to Question #1593 Submitted to "Ask the Experts"Category: Consumer Products The following question was answered by an expert in the appropriate field: Q
On your Web site you mention that some welding rods contain up to a few percent of thorium. Is this a health risk to welders? What dose could one expect to a welder using these rods? Are these rods commonly used?
A
Thorium is often found in the tungsten rods used for electric arc welding. By weight, the rods are typically 2 percent thorium. An average rod therefore contains something like 30 microcuries of thorium. The thorium is added for several reasons, e.g., to increase the alternating current carrying capacity and to reduce electrode erosion. The radiation dose is primarily due to the inhalation of the thorium and its radioactive decay products that become airborne during the welding operation. The dose due to external radiation is relatively unimportant. Dose estimates (which must be very approximate) have been generated for three groups: heavy-use welders, occasional welders, and individuals who happen to be nearby the welding operations. Keep in mind that the dose would depend, among other things, on the thorium content of the rods, the ventilation system, the number of hours welding, the amperage used, and whether it is AC or DC welding (roughly 30 times higher doses for AC welding). According to NCRP Report No. 95, the committed effective dose equivalents for one year of exposure would be:
Somewhat higher numbers were estimated in NUREG-1717:
By "committed" dose, we mean the dose over the 50-year period following the one year of exposure (remember, some of the inhaled thorium will stay in the body long after the material is inhaled). By "effective" dose we mean the uniform whole-body exposure that carries the same risk as the nonuniform internal dose (in this case, the internal dose is primarily to the bone). For comparison, a typical chest x ray would result in a 10 mrem dose. Is there a health risk? There is no evidence that doses this low carry an excess risk. However, if we take the risks observed at higher doses and extrapolate them to the low-dose region, we would conclude that 1,000 mrem (much higher than the estimated doses described above) carries an excess risk of dying of cancer of approximately five in ten thousand. By excess risk, we mean the risk exclusively due to the radiation exposure, above the one in five risk we face due to other causes. Paul Frame, CHP, PhD References:
Answer posted on 25 January 2002. The information and material posted on this Web site is intended as general reference information only. Specific facts and circumstances may alter the concepts and applications of materials and information described herein. The information provided is not a substitute for professional advice and should not be relied upon in the absence of such professional advice specific to whatever facts and circumstances are presented in any given situation. Answers are correct at the time they are posted on the Web site. Be advised that over time, some requirements could change, new data could be made available, or Internet links could change. For answers that have been posted for several months or longer, please check the current status of the posted information prior to using the responses for specific applications.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This page last updated 18 December 2009. Ask Question | Search ATE | Site Map | Privacy Statement | Disclaimer | Security Notice | Webmaster | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||